Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:21:53 +0200 | From | "Jesper Juhl" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] vsprintf.c: optimizing, part 2: base 10 conversion speedup, v2 |
| |
On 06/07/07, Douglas W. Jones <jones@cs.uiowa.edu> wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:51:52 +0200 > > Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> Using code from > >> > >> http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/bcd/decimal.html > >> (with permission from the author, Douglas W. Jones) > > > > Neither of your patches had signed-off-by:s. Would prefer that > > they were > > included please, given that we're adding stuff from someone's website. > > The material on my website was somewhere between pseudocode and > code. The web site is tutorial in nature, and what Vlasenko did > is follow my tutorial and adapt a working chunk of code from the > many code snippets in the tutorial. > > If a signoff from me is required, someone will need to tell me how, > since I have no experience with the protocols for Linux code > development. I am entirely content with the current form of credit > given to me in the code (a comment with a pointer to my web site). > Section 12 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches :
" 12) Sign your work
To improve tracking of who did what, especially with patches that can percolate to their final resting place in the kernel through several layers of maintainers, we've introduced a "sign-off" procedure on patches that are being emailed around.
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the patch, which certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the right to pass it on as a open-source patch. The rules are pretty simple: if you can certify the below:
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have the right under that license to submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution are public and that a record of the contribution (including all personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with this project or the open source license(s) involved.
then you just add a line saying
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
Some people also put extra tags at the end. They'll just be ignored for now, but you can do this to mark internal company procedures or just point out some special detail about the sign-off. "
-- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |