lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: removing refrigerator does not help with s2ram vs. fuse deadlocks (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)
Date
On Thursday, 5 July 2007 17:03, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 05:04:47PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 5 July 2007 16:39, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Why?
> >
> > You have processes that don't react to signals, because some other user land
> > task is misbehaving. I'd call that ugly at the very least.
>
> It already happens with, say, NFS. Don't think about it in terms of a
> userland task misbehaving - think of it in terms of a resource becoming
> unavailable.

I think there's a difference between a userland task playing the role of a
resource and a "real" external resource the kernel doesn't control.

IMO, userland tasks should not have the power to affect each other as though
they were parts of the kernel.

Greetings,
Rafael


--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-05 17:23    [W:0.105 / U:1.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site