lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [bug] SLUB & freeing locks [was: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions with patches]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 11:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 11:10 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > there's a new regression:
> > >
> > > SLUB does not seem to call debug_check_no_locks_freed() - hence on SLUB
> > > we will not notice certain types of freeing races. (such as freeing an
> > > object still locked and used on another CPU.) SLAB does this corretly.
>
> Oh, nm, it doesn't call debug_check_no_locks_freed() at all.
>
> This should do I guess.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>

yeah.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-26 12:53    [W:0.049 / U:1.972 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site