lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Power Management framework proposal
From
Date
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 13:14 -0700, david@lang.hm wrote:
> > I think we need a set of constraints that trickle down the power
> tree
> > and limit what a given driver can do locally.
>
> what sort of contraints are you thinking of?

A parent power state defines what states children can be in. For
example. A way to express those dependencies would be nice. Or
alternatiely, the power state of all the children defines the power
state a parent can go in automatically.

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-24 23:41    [W:0.512 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site