Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:05:08 -0700 (PDT) | From | david@lang ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation |
| |
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> david@lang.hm wrote: >> >> actually, I think that while you may be able to get away with only one >> kernel, you are probably better off with two. on the hibernate kernel you >> can choose many 'embedded' options that don't make sense for the normal >> kernel (no high mem, no SMP support, no SELinux, no network routing, not >> netfilter, use SLOB not SLAB/SLUB, etc). also keep in mind that each >> module that you load wastes apartial page of memory. > > No highmem? No thanks. > > I really want hibernate to save stuff from above 1GB as well > as the stuff below 1GB.
oops, good point. I was thinking that the hibernate kernel wouldn't need that much ram for it's own operation and forgetting that it needed to access everything the main system had.
David Lang - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |