Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 9 Jun 2007 01:20:55 -0700 | From | "Paul Menage" <> | Subject | Re: [0/1] [patch -mm] Add containerstats (v3) |
| |
On 6/9/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > Would it not be simplest to have CONTAINERS as the top-level > user-configurable item and to then have everything else depend on it? >
Yes, OK - it can go that way around too. I guess my thought was that people would be more interested in enabling/disabling the subsystems themselves (cpusets, RSS, etc) than the underlying framework. But if select has problems then it's no trouble to invert it.
Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |