Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:55:47 -0700 | From | "Paul Menage" <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers |
| |
On 6/8/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> wrote: > > Anyway the patch I sent is simple enough, and if users end up demanding > the ability to better deal with exclusive cpusets, the patch will be > simple enough to extend by changing cpuset_auto_setup(), so let's > stick with that patch since it's your preference (IIUC). >
Sounds good to me, although I think my preference would be to extend the "create()" subsystem callback with a "struct task_struct *clone_task" parameter that indicates that clone_task is cloning its own container; a subsystem like cpusets that needs to do additional setup at that point could inherit settings either from the parent or from clone_task's container (or something else) as desired. (It could also do permission checking based on properties of clone_task, etc).
Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |