Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:27:20 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down |
| |
* Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Admittedly this gives you the top five contention points, [...]
if the infrastructure your are advocating does not allow us to keep the existing output then it's simply not flexible enough. Why on earth are you even arguing about this? A "cleanup" should not change the output, simple as that. Do a patch that has the _same_ output and then we can see whether it's a good patch. You made the same mistake with your /proc/timer_stats cleanups. I dont like NACK-ing patches but you seem to be missing the basic precondition of cleanups: no functional effect to the code, and certainly no change in output.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |