Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:46:13 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: usb-scanner-cameras kernel-2.6.22 and udev-095 problem |
| |
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:18:26PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/05/07, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:00:58PM -0500, art@usfltd.com wrote: > > > greg > > > > > > and part of /etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules > > > > > > ... > > > ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end" > > > SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end" > > > > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4100C > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0101", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard Photosmart S20 (C5101A) | Hewlett-Packard Photosmart > > S20xi > > > (C7150A) > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0102", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cxi | > > > Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cse > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0105", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6250C > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0201", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3300c > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0205", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4300c > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0305", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 5200C > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0401", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3400c > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0405", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2100C > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0505", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6300C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6350C | > > > Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6390C > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0601", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2200C > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0605", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > > > > ... > > > # Dell 1600n > > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="413c", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5250", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k" > > > > > > LABEL="libsane_rules_end" > > > > > > I don't see anything odd there at all. > > > > Can you run 'git bisect' to try to narrow down to the patch that caused > > the problem? > > Any progress with this bug?
I haven't heard back from Art, and nothing looks wrong in the rules file above...
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |