Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:08:33 +0400 | From | Pavel Emelianov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] containers: implement nsproxy containers subsystem |
| |
Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Pavel Emelianov (xemul@openvz.org): >> Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>> >From 190ea72d213393dd1440643b2b87b5b2128dff87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> >>> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:18:52 -0400 >>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] containers: implement nsproxy containers subsystem >>> >>> When a task enters a new namespace via a clone() or unshare(), a new >>> container is created and the task moves into it. This enables >> I have a design question. >> >> How the child that has a new namespace guesses what id >> this namespace has in containers? > > parse /proc/$$/container
Ok.
> So more likely the parent would have to grab the cloned pid of the > child, parse /proc/$$/container, then rename the container.
Child can happen to die before this and we'll have an orphaned container. I mean, it will be deletable, but its name will be unknown.
Maybe its better to get the containers id from the pid of new task?
> -serge > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |