Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:02:59 -0700 (PDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: __get_free_pages: can GFP_DMA omit GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC? |
| |
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> all right, then some of those __get_free_pages() calls would translate > to calls of the form __get_dma_pages(0, ...) -- is that what you're > saying? or would it be equivalent and preferable to put GFP_ATOMIC in > there just so it looks not so weird?
Put GFP_ATOMIC in there so that it does not look weird.
GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH == GFP_NOWAIT
So these should have GFP_NOWAIT as far as I can tell?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |