lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API)
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:18:30AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:14 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 06:38:40PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > >
> > > 64-bit kernels can run 32-bit userspace programs. But some structures
> > > come out _differently_ between 32-bit and 64-bit compilation, so the
> > > system call needs a special 'compat' handler instead of just running the
> > > normal 64-bit system call.
> > >
> > > The 'struct timespec' is one structure which is sometimes different for
> > > 32-bit vs. 64-bit, so any system call taking a 'struct timespec' must
> > > have a separate compat_sys_xxxx() to handle that. See something like
> > > compat_sys_clock_settime() in kernel/compat.c for an example (but don't
> > > use set_fs() like it does; just see how it handles the compat_timespec).
> >
> > Did you mean something like this?
>
> How will 64-bit system calls work if you do it like that? You need to
> provide _both_ sys_time_pps_fetch() and compat_sys_time_pps_fetch().

Sorry, I'm new to this 32/64 bits issues...

Now is it correct?

diff --git a/drivers/pps/pps.c b/drivers/pps/pps.c
index befe292..b9df17b 100644
--- a/drivers/pps/pps.c
+++ b/drivers/pps/pps.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <linux/pps.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>

@@ -362,6 +363,22 @@ sys_time_pps_fetch_exit:
return ret;
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_time_pps_fetch(int source, const int tsformat,
+ struct pps_info __user *info,
+ const struct compat_timespec __user *timeout)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct timespec to;
+
+ ret = get_compat_timespec(&to, timeout);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ return sys_time_pps_fetch(source, tsformat, info, &to);
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* Module staff
*/
Since I have no way to test this code maybe is better add no function
at all and simply using a warning message if someone try compiling
this code with CONFIG_COMPAT enabled...

Ciao,

Rodolfo

--

GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@gnudd.com
Embedded Systems giometti@linux.it
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-27 14:59    [W:7.273 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site