Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:37:17 -0700 (PDT) | From | Casey Schaufler <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: Convert LSM into a static interface |
| |
--- Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> wrote:
> * Casey Schaufler (casey@schaufler-ca.com) wrote: > > So, for planning purposes, when ought I expect to have to start > > dealing with this? > > What is your specific concern or use case?
Just hoping to avoid a change collision. If I have to deal with this today it's easy, if it doesn't show up anywhere until 2.6.28 I'm breezing, but if it all hits in two weeks I have some scrambling and yet another delay to deal with. Not your problem, a little information would be helpful though.
BTW, I reviewed my notes from the early days of LSM and it turns out that I agree with the notion that loadable modules don't make a whole lot of sense. So long as I can choose security models as easily as I can change file systems, I'm reasonably happy. That, and that the "default" "regular" policy isn't too terribly different from the traditional Unix policy.
Casey Schaufler casey@schaufler-ca.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |