Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:38:13 -0400 | From | "Albert Cahalan" <> | Subject | Re: JIT emulator needs |
| |
On 6/20/07, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > Look, let's back up a bit here. At a high level, what exactly do > > you imagine that this behavior was intended for? I suggest you > > list some examples of the attacks that are blocked. > > > > Can you come up with a reasonable argument that the current behavior > > is the least painful restriction required to block those attacks? > > Does the current behavior block any attack that the proposed behavior > > would not? (list the attacks please) > > See above.
Nope. I asked you to justify the existing behavior. Apparently you are unable to do so. This should be a hint. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |