Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:45:27 -0700 (PDT) | From | david@lang ... | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| |
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2007, david@lang.hm wrote: > >> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>> If it's input-only, then you can't possibly harm the operation of the >>> network by only listening in, can you? > >> Ok, so you consider any anti-piracy measures to be something that >> GPLv3 should prohibit. > > In general, I object to the use of my code in ways that don't permit > users to run it for any purpose, study it, adapt it to suit their own > needs, modify the code and distribute it, modified or not. > > If this means my code can't be used to implement DRM, that's a good > thing. > > All anti-piracy measures I've ever known deprive users of legitimate > rights too. So, yes, I don't agree with these measures. > > I believe in punishing the guilty, not in punishing innocent > bystanders just such that the guilty have to find work arounds to > become guilty.
this is your right with your code. please stop browbeating people who disagree with you.
David Lang - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |