| Date | Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:50:02 -0600 | From | Andreas Dilger <> | Subject | Re: [34/37] Large blocksize support in ramfs |
| |
On Jun 20, 2007 11:29 -0700, clameter@sgi.com wrote: > If you apply this patch and then you can f.e. try this: > > mount -tramfs -o10 none /media
> @@ -164,10 +165,15 @@ static int ramfs_fill_super(struct super > + if (options && *options) > + order = simple_strtoul(options, NULL, 10);
This is probably a bad name for a mount option. What about "order=10"? Otherwise you prevent any other option from being used in the future.
Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|