Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:31:24 +0200 | From | "Jesper Juhl" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] clarify the GPL version of contributions by Jesper Juhl in CREDITS |
| |
On 18/06/07, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:33:02AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > Just to make things clear in the light of recent discussions. > > Stuff I contribute to the Linux kernel are licensed under the terms of the > > GPL version 2. > > > > +D: All contributions are licensed under the terms of the GPL version 2. > > I suspect this is the default for the vast majority of kernel developers. > Perhaps it's only worth special casing those that have an interest in > GPLv3, as the numbers are bound to be far lower -- if this sort of thing > is judged to be a good idea, that is (It's rather interesting to note > that the vast majority of GPLv3 advocates don't even have a single > changeset in the kernel, yet still feel that their input on kernel > licensing is somehow relevant or valid). > Explicitly marking the GPLv3 supporters would probably result in the smaller set, but I just felt that it was important to make my own position absolutely clear.
-- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |