Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:28:17 -0700 | From | Martin Bligh <> | Subject | Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21) |
| |
Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: >> I'm seeing this long (198) thread and just have no idea how it has >> ended (wiki? hand-mailing?). > > I'm hoping it's not "ended". > > IOW, I really don't think we _resolved_ anything, although the work that > Adrian started is continuing through the wiki and other people trying to > track regressions, and that was obviously something good. > > But I don't think we really know where we want to take this thing in the > long run. I think everybody wants a better bug-tracking system, but > whether something that makes people satisfied can even be built is open. > It sure doesn't seem to exist right now ;)
I know you hate bugzilla ... but at least I can try to make that bit of the process work better.
The new version just rolled out does have a simple "regression" checkbox (and you can search on it), which will hopefully help people keep track of the ones already in bugzilla more easily.
Thanks to Jon T, Dave J et al. for helping to figure out methods and implement them.
M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |