Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:55:30 +0200 | From | "Michal Piotrowski" <> | Subject | Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel? |
| |
On 18/06/07, Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Sunday 17 June 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > We of course do want to minimise the amount of overhead for each > > > developer. I'm a strong believer in specialisation: rather than > > > requiring that *every* developer/maintainer integrate new steps in their > > > processes it would be better to allow them to proceed in a > > > close-to-usual fashion and to provide for a specialist person (or team) > > > to do the sorts of things which you're thinking about. > > > > Makes sense... however we need to educate each and every developer about > > importance of the code review and proper recognition of reviewers. > > That's as easy to manage as is currently done with rc-regressions.
Are you a volunteer?
It's not an easy task, there are more patches than regressions.
Regards, Michal
-- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |