Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 | Date | Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:01:58 +0100 | From | Sanjoy Mahajan <> |
| |
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl> writes: > > So, by making the COPYING contain the v2 text, is the author > > specifying a particular version? If yes, then the sec. 9 provision > > would be meaningless, since there would be no way to not specify a > > version number. > > Of course the "published under terms of GPL." would do.
It would do, if you could stop there and say no more. But:
You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you...give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License along with the Program. [GPLv2, section 1]
So you have to give recipients the license text from a particular version of the GPL. To make that the only version unde which the work is licensed, you have to add something like "Licensed under the GPLv2". Otherwise sec. 9 says that you offer the work under any version of the GPL, and the licensee can take his or her pick -- even using v1 (!).
-Sanjoy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |