Messages in this thread | | | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] never called printk statement in ide-taskfile.c::wait_drive_not_busy | Date | Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:45:36 +0200 |
| |
Hi,
On Tuesday 05 June 2007, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > > On 06/04/2007 10:21 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c b/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c > > > index 30175c7..5e05311 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c > > > +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c > > > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static u8 wait_drive_not_busy(ide_drive_t *drive) > > > while (((stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG)) & BUSY_STAT) && retries--) > > > udelay(10); > > > > > > - if (!retries) > > > + if (retries < 0) > > > > if (stat & BUSY_STAT) > > > > > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: drive still BUSY!\n", drive->name); > > > > > Oh, yes. > Giving `retries' both roles: loop counter and condition flag for logging > may not good. > > > for (retries = 0; retries < 100; retries++) > { > if ((stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG)) & BUSY_STAT) > break; > > udelay(10); > } > > > if (stat & BUSY_STAT) > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: drive still BUSY!\n", drive->name);
Please re-submit this fix in the form of a patch so I can merge it.
Thanks, Bart - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |