Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 | From | Alexandre Oliva <> | Date | Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:11:29 -0300 |
| |
On Jun 15, 2007, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net> wrote:
> I've looked through the GPLv3 and "tivoization" and DRM are the only things > that are functionally different. In reading the GPLv3 *again* today I got the > impression that there are more restrictions than grants of rights.
http://fsfla.org/svnwiki/blogs/lxo/draft/gplv3-snowwhite discusses each one of the significant changes (and some of the insignificant ones) and shows why each one of them is more "tit-for-tat" than v2.
-- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |