Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:45:08 -0400 | From | Bill Nottingham <> | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| |
Alexandre Oliva (aoliva@redhat.com) said: > And since the specific implementation involves creating a derived work > of the GPLed kernel (the signature, or the signed image, or what have > you)
Wait, a signed filesystem image that happens to contain GPL code is now a derived work? Under what sort of interpretation does *that* occur?
(This pretty much throws the 'aggregation' premise in GPLv2 completely out.)
Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |