Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:47:11 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| |
* Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@netone.net.tr> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote: > >* Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@netone.net.tr> wrote: > > > > > >>[...] Just, I asked simple question and included a simple example in > >>it. [...] > >> > > > >actually, what you said was this: > > > >" I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License" > > the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL > > compatible.). " > > > Why don't you include the last sentence I wrote: "So,we should have more > fruits (like ZFS,DTrace etc.) ;-) "
You might as well have said "the moon is made out of cheese" and i'd not have quoted it either. Why? Because it's irrelevant to the fundamental point that was raised and which you keep ignoring: that the only "example" you cited is a hypothetical that is currently false. In any case, speculation about what Sun might or might not do, up until the point it actually does it, is not something i feel compelled to do anything over, so please stop wasting my time by Cc:-ing me. Thanks,
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |