Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:08:42 +0100 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| |
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:18AM +0300, Tarkan Erimer wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 05:21:53PM +0300, Tarkan Erimer wrote: > > > >> I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License" the > >> OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL compatible.). > >> > > > >The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not want to > >accept GPLv3, why not discuss this with them if you want to try to > >change their minds? > > > It was just an example came to my mind at first when thinking about > "Dual Licensing" or upgrading Linux Kernel to the GPLv3. Yeah maybe,the > "OpenSolaris Community" do not want GPLv3. But; IMHO, it is in the hands > of "Sun" not the "OpenSolaris Community".
Perhaps. However, since the only thing in hands of your kind of advocates is best not mentioned on a family-friendly maillist, may I suggest taking that exciting thread to more appropriate place? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |