Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:32:09 +0900 | From | Paul Mundt <> | Subject | Re: [patch-mm 01/23] NOHZ: Fix ARM,SH,SPARC64 idle nohz handling |
| |
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:20:59AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 09:26 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > > > There are two paths here depending on hlt/nohlt setting, we need to have > > tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() for the TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG case, too. > > Do you really want to run through that in every loop iteration ? If you > have nohlt, then nohz is rather pointless. > Well, nohlt is a corner case, but even so, nohz doesn't really make much sense in the polling case. tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick() is also safe in either path, so let's just go with your original patch. Sorry for the noise.
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |