Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fuse: ->fs_flags fixlet | From | Miklos Szeredi <> | Date | Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:49:23 +0200 |
| |
> fs/fuse/inode.c:658:3: error: Initializer entry defined twice > fs/fuse/inode.c:661:3: also defined here
Duh, that's a stupid conflict. I wonder why I don't get this compile error...
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Andrew, please send this for 2.6.22.
There's another one, which is -mm only. I'll post a patch.
Thanks, Miklos
> --- > > fs/fuse/inode.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c > @@ -655,10 +655,9 @@ static int fuse_get_sb_blk(struct file_system_type *fs_type, > static struct file_system_type fuseblk_fs_type = { > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > .name = "fuseblk", > - .fs_flags = FS_HAS_SUBTYPE, > .get_sb = fuse_get_sb_blk, > .kill_sb = kill_block_super, > - .fs_flags = FS_REQUIRES_DEV, > + .fs_flags = FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_HAS_SUBTYPE, > }; > > static inline int register_fuseblk(void) > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |