Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:53 -0500 | From | Eric Sandeen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Recursive lock_kernel() is OK.
Oh, it is? Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a good thing.... :)
Ok, let me look into it further. I changed lock_kernel to udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it. I'll investigate further.
-Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |