lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/5] lockstat: core infrastructure
From
Date
Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> writes:

> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 19:16 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > >From the architecture perspective there are two low level clock hooks to
> > > implement one is sched_clock() , and at least one clocksource structure.
> > > Both do essentially the same thing. With timekeepings clocksource
> > > structure actually being easier to implement cause the math is built in.
> >
> > I think you are mistaken here; the two are similar but not identical.
> >
> > I see sched_clock() as fast first, accurate second. Whereas the
> > clocksource thing is accurate first, fast second.
>
> This is true .. However, if there is a speed different it's small.

pmtimer (factor 1000+) or HPET (factor 10-100+ depending on CPU)
accesses are much slower than TSC or jiffies read. Talking to the
southbridge is slow.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-01 15:33    [W:0.062 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site