Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 28 May 2007 11:56:32 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/3] PM: Hibernation and suspend notifiers |
| |
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > > Make it possible to register hibernation and suspend notifiers, so that > subsystems can perform hibernation-related or suspend-related operations that > should not be carried out by device drivers' .suspend() and .resume() routines.
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(pm_notifier_lock); > + > +static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(pm_chain);
Is there any particular reason you chose to use a RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD with an explicit mutex instead of using a BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD?
Alan Stern
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |