Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 02 May 2007 13:59:36 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: arch/i386/boot rewrite, and all the hard-coded video cards |
| |
Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> [...] >> 80x50 is useful for the above reason. Yeah, it's ugly, but it's useful for >> the "It's too much work to try to do anything but just take a digital >> photo of the screen". And that 50-line mode will actually be 43 in EGA >> mode, I think. >> >> The 132x50 mode is probably a bit prettier, and is fairly common too, and >> useful for the same reason. > > Seconded. 80x50, and where platforms support it, *80x60 and 132x60*, > is kinda handy (despite the font getting smaller and smaller, heh), > esp. when you don't run it in VMware and not have some capturing > device (serial con/netconsole.. takes time to set up) >
This is what I've decided on doing:
I'm having a framework for multiple drivers (probe and set methods, basically); the stock distro will have VGA and VESA drivers only. Dropping new drivers in is trivial if someone wants to. I was going to leave in the CL54xx and ATI drivers since I actually have specimens of those, except it appears that on current specimens of those cards, the probe succeeds but the mode-setting fails, so I dropped those as well.
If someone happens to have algorithms for setting 132-character mode on especially the CL54xx series with raw register writes I'd actually be interested, since that's what Bochs and Qemu emulate, and on those it would be really nice to have a larger text mode.
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |