Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 May 2007 13:24:50 -0700 | From | "Darrick J. Wong" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 |
| |
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:04:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Looks like SAS needs to require CONFIG_ATA... > > > > Yes, but it seems wrong to disable all of libsas if !ATA. Only sas_ata.o > should depend on that. > > Darrick, is there any point in me carrying this tree? It doesn't appear to > be a hotbed of activity...
Nope. I haven't worked on those bits of code in quite a while, since a number of scsi/libata reorganizations were discussed at the storage summit that would make a fair amount of the sas_ata code unnecessary (or candidates for reworking).
--D [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |