lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: select(0, ..) is valid ?
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Perhaps putting a size=0 detector into slab also would speed this
> process up.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

Index: linux-2.6/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slab.c 2007-05-15 11:32:25.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6/mm/slab.c 2007-05-15 11:35:55.000000000 -0700
@@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *__find_
*/
BUG_ON(malloc_sizes[INDEX_AC].cs_cachep == NULL);
#endif
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(size == 0);
while (size > csizep->cs_size)
csizep++;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-15 20:39    [W:0.078 / U:2.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site