Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Tue, 15 May 2007 11:36:43 -0700 (PDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: select(0, ..) is valid ? |
| |
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Perhaps putting a size=0 detector into slab also would speed this > process up.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Index: linux-2.6/mm/slab.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slab.c 2007-05-15 11:32:25.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6/mm/slab.c 2007-05-15 11:35:55.000000000 -0700 @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *__find_ */ BUG_ON(malloc_sizes[INDEX_AC].cs_cachep == NULL); #endif + WARN_ON_ONCE(size == 0); while (size > csizep->cs_size) csizep++; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |