Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:57:27 +0530 | From | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem |
| |
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:09:39AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Losing the directory isn't a big deal though. And both unsharing a > namespace (which causes a ns_container_clone) and mounting the hierarchy > are done by userspace, so if for some installation it is a big deal, > the init scripts on initrd can mount the hierarchy before doing any > unsharing.
Yes I thought of that after posting this (that initrd can mount the hierarchies), so this should not be an issue in practice ..
> Can you think of a reason why losing a few directories matters?
If we loose directories, then we don't have a way to manage the task-group it represents thr' the filesystem interface, so I consider that bad. As we agree, this will not be an issue if initrd mounts the ns hierarchy atleast at bootup.
-- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |