lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
    On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:59:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >
    > * Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
    >
    > > 2.6.21-rc7-cfs-v2
    > > 534.80user 30.92system 2:23.64elapsed 393%CPU
    > > 534.75user 31.01system 2:23.70elapsed 393%CPU
    > > 534.66user 31.07system 2:23.76elapsed 393%CPU
    > > 534.56user 30.91system 2:23.76elapsed 393%CPU
    > > 534.66user 31.07system 2:23.67elapsed 393%CPU
    > > 535.43user 30.62system 2:23.72elapsed 393%CPU
    >
    > Thanks for testing this! Could you please try this also with:
    >
    > echo 100000000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity
    >
    > on the same system, so that we can get a complete set of numbers? Just
    > to make sure that lowering the preemption frequency indeed has the
    > expected result of moving kernbench numbers back to mainline levels. (if
    > not then that would indicate some CFS buglet)
    >
    > could you maybe even try a more extreme setting of:
    >
    > echo 500000000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity
    >
    > for kicks? This would allow us to see how much kernbench we lose due to
    > preemption granularity. Thanks!

    Yeah but I just powered down the test-box, so I'll have to get onto
    that tomorrow.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-17 13:15    [W:3.562 / U:0.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site