lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: hardwired VMI crap
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Ingo, either you or Thomas have vetoed every attempt we have made to
>> make our code operate with clockevents. [...]
>>
>
> this is news to me - do you have any proof of such a veto?
>

Yes, your refusal to discuss any technical details when asked point
blank which solution you prefer, and your continued whining and
threatening to unmerge our code.

And I ask again for your feedback on which approach you think is correct:

1) Rewrite the interrupt subsystem of our hypervisor, making it
incompatible with full virtualization, so that we can support an
abstract interrupt controller with a "clean" interface
2) Reuse the same method that HPET, PIT and other time clients in i386
use - the global_clock_event pointer which allows you to wrest control
back from the APIC and reuse the lapic_events local clockevents.
3) Create a new low level interrupt handler for the per-cpu VMI timer
IRQs instead of re-using the APIC handler
4) Use the irq APIs to allocate IRQ-0 as a percpu IRQ, then change the
IO-APIC code so it can know not to convert this PIC IRQ into a IO-APIC
edge IRQ.
5) Disable the io-apic code entirely in paravirt mode. Rather than
change it, merge a parallel copy of it into the VMI code
so that we can use the 99% of the code we need, with the one bugfix for
#4 above
6) Disable the apic code entirely in paravirt mode. Rather than change
it, merge a parallel copy of into the VMI code so that we can use the
90% of the code we need, with changes to the LVT0 timer handling.
7) For SMP only, allocate a non-shared IO-APIC IRQ, then after the
IO-APIC is initialized, magically switch this to a percpu handler and
start delivering local timer interrupts via this IRQ.
8) Create a pie-in-the-sky single interrupt source, reserve an IDT
vector for it (or steal the lapic timer slot), and use the irq apis to
set it up to be handled as a per-cpu interrupt. This actually sounds
pretty good, to me. The only problem is we will need to switch the
timer IRQ from IRQ 0 to this vector when the APIC is initialized, but I
think we already have all the machinery we need to handle that.
9) ???

Zach

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-08 23:41    [W:0.099 / U:0.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site