Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:30:55 +0530 | From | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy! |
| |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > I still think the complaint was about terminology, not implementation.
I don't think that is what http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/426 conveyed!
> They just didn't want you calling them containers.
Yes that too.
> > Anyway, summarizing on "why nsproxy", the main point (I think) is about > > using existing abstraction in the kernel.
s/abstraction/"implementation detail" then :)
> But nsproxy is not an abstraction, it's an implementation > detail/optimization.
-- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |