Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:21:52 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpusets/sched_domain reconciliation |
| |
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:14:35 -0600 cpw@sgi.com (Cliff Wickman) wrote:
> This patch reconciles cpusets and sched_domains that get out of sync > due to disabling and re-enabling of cpu's.
I get three-out-of-three rejects in cpuset.c. I could fix them, but I wouldn't be very confident that the result works at runtime. 2.6.20-rc6 was a long time ago - please, always raise patches against the latest mainline kernel (the daily git snapshot suffices).
Recursion is a big no-no in kernel. Is there any way in which it can be avoided? Is Dinakar's implementation also recursive? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |