lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/9] ioatdma: Push pending transactions to hardware more frequently
From
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:14:39 -0500

> Chris Leech wrote:
> > Every 20 descriptors turns out to be to few append commands with
> > newer/faster CPUs. Pushing every 4 still cuts down on MMIO writes to an
> > acceptable level without letting the DMA engine run out of work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/dma/ioatdma.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/ioatdma.c b/drivers/dma/ioatdma.c
> > index 8e87261..0f77a9d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/ioatdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/ioatdma.c
> > @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static dma_cookie_t do_ioat_dma_memcpy(struct ioat_dma_chan *ioat_chan,
> > list_splice_init(&new_chain, ioat_chan->used_desc.prev);
> >
> > ioat_chan->pending += desc_count;
> > - if (ioat_chan->pending >= 20) {
> > + if (ioat_chan->pending >= 4) {
>
> This sounds like something that will always be wrong -- or in other
> words, always be right for only the latest CPUs. Can this be made
> dynamic, based on some timing factor?

In fact I think this has been tweaked twice in the vanilla tree
already.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-03 05:29    [W:0.188 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site