Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:55:41 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: [patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote: > > >> * virtual block device (blockfront) >> * virtual network device (netfront) >> > > note, these drivers should be submitted through the proper block drivers > and network drivers review process - not via the x86_64 tree. >
Yes; who should look at them? I posted netfront to net-dev, and Stephen Hemminger commented on it on the last repost, but I'd love them to get more scrutiny.
Obviously they're not actually useful without Xen (and vice-versa), so there's not much point in committing them separately.
J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |