Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:49:16 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Robert P. J. Day" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO -> BUILD_BUG_OR_ZERO |
| |
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 08:23 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> I have to admit that I don't see the point here - I can't seem to make > >> any sense of the OR... Jan > > > > At least one other person thought that: > > > > #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) BUILD_BUG_ON((e) == 0) > > > > OTOH, BUILD_BUG_OR_ZERO says what happens: either it's a build bug, or > > it's zero. > > What about ZERO_UNLESS_BUILD_BUG_ON(e)? It's long though...
how often is this going to be used? it's not like the tree is currently awash in calls to BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO as it is.
rday
-- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |