Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:16:37 +0530 | From | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch |
| |
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:31:26AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > we've already had some trouble with nsproxy holding things with > different lifetimes. As it happens the solution this time was to put > the pid namespace where it belongs - not in nsproxy - so maybe moving > this info into nsproxies will be fine, it just rings a warning bell.
nsproxy seems the best place to me to hang off the resource control objects (nsproxy->ctlr_data[]). These objects provide information like resource limit etc required by the resource controllers.
Alternately we could move them to task_struct which would cause unnecessary duplication of pointers (and wastage of space).
-- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |