Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Date | Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:18:05 +1100 |
| |
Hi Dmitry!
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 22:27 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > On Friday 09 February 2007 21:05, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > [ 17.684475] Device driver serio0 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > [ 17.684724] Device driver serio1 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > [ 17.684874] Device driver psaux lacks bus and class support for being suspended or resumed. > > [ 17.685015] Device driver serio2 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > [ 18.373576] Device driver serio3 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > [ 18.375666] Device driver serio4 lacks bus and class support for being resumed. > > > > You should probably only warn if driver does not have resume method - not > having suspend is quite valid if driver is able to restore state at resume > without explicitely saving anything at suspend time.
Can do. Will do :)
Nigel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |