lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21
On 2/9/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:54:29 +0200 Lenar Lõhmus <lenar@vision.ee> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > sched-add-above-background-load-function.patch
> > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching.patch
> > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching-vs-zvc-stuff.patch
> > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching-vs-zvc-stuff-2.patch
> > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching-use-ctl_unnumbered.patch
> > > swap_prefetch-vs-zoned-counters.patch
> > > add-include-linux-freezerh-and-move-definitions-from-prefetch.patch
> > > zvc-support-nr_slab_reclaimable--nr_slab_unreclaimable-swap_prefetch.patch
> > > reduce-max_nr_zones-swap_prefetch-remove-incorrect-use-of-zone_highmem.patch
> > > sched-cleanup-remove-task_t-convert-to-struct-task_struct-prefetch.patch
> > > numa-add-zone_to_nid-function-swap_prefetch.patch
> > > remove-uses-of-kmem_cache_t-from-mm-and-include-linux-slabh-prefetch.patch
> > >
> > > Hold.
> > Why hold?
> >
> > It's been shown this patchset really helps desktop users.
>
> Has it? I don't think I've ever observed any benefits from it and I don't
> think anyone has ever got down and worked out what its drawbacks might be,
> and seen if they can be demonstrated in practice.
>

Plenty of people replied with positive reviews when it was posted
earlier. I'd expect that you'd have a fair bit of ram, so you're less
likely to observe any benefit, as you wouldnt be digging into swap as
often as those on lesser systems.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/23/25

> I also have vague memories of some serious-sounding review comments about
> the code from Nick.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/23/55

Could that be it? Maybe repoll Con on those.

> > Why keep it in -mm for so long?
>
> I'm waiting to be shown that its benefits exceed its costs. Sometimes
> that's hard.
>

Con's patchset is used pretty widely now, with many distro's (Arch,
Mandriva, PCLinuxOS among others) providing prebuilt kernels and
nobody has reported any drawbacks. I don't think anyone in -mm has
reported any either.

James
--
iphitus // Arch Developer // kernel26beyond // iphitus.loudas.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-09 13:51    [W:0.616 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site