Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:39:34 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: device_destroy |
| |
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:51:08PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > While porting over a few class_devices I discovered a problem with > device_destroy. It uses a dev_t which several classes don't use. > Should all classes require a dev_t or should we just pass in the device > itself?
As you don't have a dev_t, then you have a handle to the 'struct device' itself, right? Then just call device_unregister(), that's all that device_destroy() does after it finds the device in the list of devices associated with the class.
Does this help?
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |