Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:04:08 +0100 | Subject | Re: search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch | From | Oleg Verych <> |
| |
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:40:28AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: [] > by this argument, why does mkuboot.sh exist at all then ? let's > simply delete mkuboot.sh and change all arch Makefile's like so: > - $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE) ... > + -mkimage ...
Yes (with TOOLCHAIN prefix).
> i of course prefer the existing solution: call the mkuboot.sh script > which checks for a few variations of the `mkimage` binary and if it > does not exist, output a friendly message
so as `make' will, but better than patched "friendly message", which doesn't reflect: neither change to toolchain prefix, nor possible permission problems, or what ever it can be, preventing actual running the command ;)
____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |