Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:28:03 -0500 | From | "Mike Frysinger" <> | Subject | Re: + search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz> wrote: > proposition is to substitute: > "$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)" > with > "mkimage"
this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical mkimage-missing scenario ...
with mkuboot.sh you'd get output like: ... UIMAGE arch/blackfin/boot/vmImage "mkimage" command not found - U-Boot images will not be built Building modules, stage 2. ...
with mkimage you'd get output like: ... UIMAGE arch/blackfin/boot/vmImage /bin/sh: mkimage: command not found make[1]: *** [arch/blackfin/boot/vmImage] Error 127 make: *** [vmImage] Error 2
so while you could change all the Makefile's to insert - to ignore *all* failures, without the script, you loose the ability to only ignore "binary missing" errors -mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |