Messages in this thread | | | From | Zach Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling | Date | Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:21:31 -0500 |
| |
> No, that's *really* it ;)
For syscalls, sure.
The kevent work incorporates Uli's desire to have more data per event. Have you read his OLS stuff? It's been a while since I did so I've lost the details of why he cares to have more.
Let me say it again, maybe a little louder this time: I'm not interested in worrying about this aspect of the API until the scheduler mechanics are more solidified.
- z - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |