Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:44:43 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Problem with freezable workqueues |
| |
On Wed 2007-02-28 23:39:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 28 February 2007 21:35, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 02/28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > Okay, but I've just finished the patch that removes the freezability of > > > workqueues (appended), so can we please do this in a separate one? > > > > Please, please, no. This patch is of course correct, but it breaks _a lot_ > > of patches in -mm tree. > > > > May I ask you to send just > > > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c > > > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c > > > @@ -1829,11 +1829,11 @@ xfs_buf_init(void) > > > if (!xfs_buf_zone) > > > goto out_free_trace_buf; > > > > > > - xfslogd_workqueue = create_freezeable_workqueue("xfslogd"); > > > + xfslogd_workqueue = create_workqueue("xfslogd"); > > > if (!xfslogd_workqueue) > > > goto out_free_buf_zone; > > > > > > - xfsdatad_workqueue = create_freezeable_workqueue("xfsdatad"); > > > + xfsdatad_workqueue = create_workqueue("xfsdatad"); > > > if (!xfsdatad_workqueue) > > > goto out_destroy_xfslogd_workqueue; > > > > > > > > > > this bit? > > > > After that, we can do the "removes the freezability of workqueues" patch > > against -mm tree. > > Okay, if that's better. > > Pavel, is that acceptable to you?
No problem, but get that acked-by: from XFS people ;-). Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |