Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:36:16 -0800 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: Menuconfig has butterfly effects? |
| |
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:12:42 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:
> I ran "make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig", did a lot of editing, and saved > the .config. Then I copied that to a backup, ran "make oldconfig" on the > config I'd just saved, and compared it with the backup: > > --- .config 2007-02-27 18:10:01.000000000 -0500 > +++ tryit 2007-02-27 18:09:09.000000000 -0500 > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > # > # Automatically generated make config: don't edit > # Linux kernel version: 2.6.20 > -# Tue Feb 27 18:10:01 2007 > +# Tue Feb 27 18:08:41 2007 > # > CONFIG_X86_64=y > CONFIG_64BIT=y > @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ > # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set > # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set > CONFIG_ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE=y > +# CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL is not set > +# CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set > +# CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is not set > CONFIG_FLATMEM=y > CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y > # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_STATIC is not set > > The first hunk I expect, the second I did not. Anybody care to venture a > guess why the visibility logic is unstable?
can we get .config^Wtryit ? (version 0, not version 1)
--- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |